help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRANZ, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by HUMMLER, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FRANZ, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by HUMMLER, H. D.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 164, Number 1, July 2001, 36-42

Preserved Spontaneous Breathing Improves Cardiac Output during Partial Liquid Ventilation

AXEL R. FRANZ, CHRISTINA MACK, JULIA REICHART, FRANK POHLANDT, and HELMUT D. HUMMLER

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology and Pediatric Critical Care, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

The aim of this study was to examine whether preserved spontaneous breathing (SB) supported by proportional-assist ventilation (PAV) would improve cardiac output (CO) during partial liquid ventilation (PLV) in rabbits with and without lung disease if compared with time-cycled, volume-controlled ventilation (CV) combined with muscle paralysis (MP). PLV was initiated in 17 healthy rabbits and 17 surfactant-depleted rabbits using 12 to 15 ml/kg of perfluorodecaline. Both ventilatory modes, SB+PAV and CV+MP, were applied in random sequence using a crossover design. CO was measured by thermodilution. CO was significantly higher during SB+PAV than during CV+MP: 136 ± 21 ml/kgmin (mean ± SD) versus 120 ± 30 ml/kgmin (p = 0.004) in healthy rabbits, and 147 ± 19 ml/kgmin versus 111 ± 13 ml/kgmin (p < 0.0001) in surfactant-depleted rabbits, resulting in an improved oxygen delivery. This difference was mainly caused by a larger stroke volume during SB+PAV, whereas there was little change in heart rate. In surfactant-depleted rabbits, SB+PAV resulted in improved arterial blood pressure and arterial and mixed venous pH and in a higher PaO2 at the same level of PEEP and mean airway pressure. We conclude that during PLV, CO is higher during SB+PAV than during CV+MP, resulting in an improved oxygen delivery. In surfactant-depleted rabbits, improved CO, oxygen delivery, and arterial blood pressure resulted in higher pH, possibly reflecting improved tissue perfusion and oxygenation.

Keywords: Fluorocarbons; ventilation, mechanical; respiration, artificial; hemodynamics; cardiac output; paralysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. TOBIN
Critical Care Medicine in AJRCCM 2001
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2002; 165(5): 565 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2001 American Thoracic Society
  2009/2010 ATS Fellows Career Development Awards