help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published ahead of print on May 8, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-090OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200801-090OCv1
178/3/225    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. A.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 178. pp. 225-232, (2008)
© 2008 American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200801-090OC


Original Article

Intersession Variability in Single-Breath Diffusing Capacity in Diabetics without Overt Lung Disease

Michael B. Drummond1, Pamela F. Schwartz2, William T. Duggan2, John G. Teeter2, Richard J. Riese2, Richard C. Ahrens3, Robert O. Crapo4, Richard D. England2, Neil R. MacIntyre5, Robert L. Jensen4 and Robert A. Wise1

1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 2 Pfizer Global Research and Development, New London, Connecticut; 3 University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; 4 University of Utah, and Pulmonary Division, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah; and 5 Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to M. Bradley Drummond, M.D., The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, JHAAC 4B.70, Baltimore, MD 21224. E-mail: mdrummo3{at}jhmi.edu

Rationale: American Thoracic Society guidelines state that a 10% or greater intersession change in diffusing capacity of the lung (DLCO) should be considered clinically significant. However, little is known about the short-term intersession variability in DLCO in untrained subjects or how variability is affected by rigorous external quality control.

Objectives: To characterize the intersession variability of DLCO and the effect of different quality control methods in untrained individuals without significant lung disease.

Methods: Data were pooled from the comparator arms of 14 preregistration trials of inhaled insulin that included nonsmoking diabetic patients without significant lung disease. A total of 699 participants performed repeated DLCO measurements using a highly standardized technique. A total of 948 participants performed repeated measurements using routine clinical testing.

Measurements and Main Results: The mean intersession absolute change in DLCO using the highly standardized method was 1.45 ml/minute/mm Hg (5.64%) compared with 2.49 ml/minute/mm Hg (9.52%) in the routine testing group (P < 0.0001 for both absolute and percent difference). The variability in absolute intersession change in DLCO increased with increasing baseline DLCO values, whereas the absolute percentage of intersession change was stable across baseline values. Depending on the method, 15.5 to 35.5% of participants had an intersession change of 10% or greater. A 20% or greater threshold would reduce this percentage of patients to 1 to 10%.

Conclusions: Intersession variability in DLCO measurement is dependent on the method of testing used and baseline DLCO. Using a more liberal threshold to define meaningful intersession change may reduce the misclassification of normal variation as abnormal change.

Key Words: respiratory function testing • diffusing capacity • intersession variability • inhaled human insulin • methodology


AT A GLANCE COMMENTARY

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject
Intersession variability in single-breath diffusing capacity is poorly characterized in previous studies.

What This Study Adds to the Field
Our study shows that the current criterion of 10% for determining clinical change in diffusing capacity may be too sensitive, and we suggest a 20–25% threshold as more appropriate.

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society
  ATS State of the Art Course 2008