help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on August 21, 2008, doi:10.1164/rccm.200807-1029OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 178, Number 9, November 2008, 989-993

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200807-1029OCv1
178/9/989    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Nuermberger, E. L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Nuermberger, E. L

Submitted on July 4, 2008
Accepted on August 21, 2008

Whither Isoniazid or Moxifloxacin in Rifapentine-based Regimens for Experimental Tuberculosis?

Ian M Rosenthal1, Ming Zhang2, Deepak Almeida2, Jacques H Grosset2, and Eric L Nuermberger1*

1 Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2 Center for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: enuermb{at}jhmi.edu.

Rationale: Recent studies demonstrated that combined substitutions of rifapentine for rifampin and moxifloxacin for isoniazid in the standard daily short-course regimen of rifampin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide produces stable cure in 12 wks or less. This study was designed to more precisely evaluate the contribution of moxifloxacin and isoniazid to rifapentine-based regimens. Objectives: We compared bactericidal activity and treatment shortening potential between regimens consisting of isoniazid or moxifloxacin plus rifapentine and pyrazinamide administered either thrice-weekly or daily. Methods: Using a mouse model of tuberculosis we assessed bactericidal activity by performing quantitative cultures of lung homogenates over the first 12 weeks of treatment. Relapse rates were assessed after completing 8, 10, and 12 weeks of treatment to determine the duration of treatment necessary for stable cure. Measurements and Main Results: After 4 weeks treatment, daily and thrice-weekly therapy with rifapentine, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide was significantly more active than treatment with rifapentine, isoniazid and pyrazinamide. By 8 weeks treatment all mice receiving the moxifloxacin-based regimens were lung culture negative whereas those mice receiving the isoniazid-based regimens continued to be lung culture positive. However, the duration of treatment necessary to achieve stable cure was 10 weeks for daily regimens and 12 weeks for thrice-weekly regimens, regardless of whether isoniazid or moxifloxacin was used. All mice receiving standard daily therapy with rifampin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide relapsed after 12 weeks treatment. Conclusions: These results suggest that regimens consisting of isoniazid or moxifloxacin plus rifapentine and pyrazinamide may dramatically shorten the duration of treatment needed to cure human tuberculosis.


Key words: tuberculosis, rifapentine, treatment







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Conference