help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on March 19, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200811-1729OC

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 180, Number 5, September 2009, 437-444

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
200811-1729OCv1
180/5/437    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, H. E
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y C G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, H. E
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y C G.

Submitted on November 15, 2008
Accepted on March 18, 2009

The Clinical Impact and Reliability of Pleural Fluid Mesothelin in Undiagnosed Pleural Effusions

Helen E Davies1, Ross S Sadler2, Silvia Bielsa3, Nicholas A Maskell4, Najib M Rahman1, Robert J.O. Davies1, Berne L Ferry2, and Y C Gary Lee1*

1 Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2 Churchill Hospital, Department of Clinical Immunology, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3 University College, Centre for Respiratory Research, London, United Kingdom, 4 University of Bristol and Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ycgarylee{at}hotmail.com.

Background: Serum mesothelin is a new biomarker for the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma patients commonly present with pleural effusions. To define the clinical utility of mesothelin quantification in pleural fluid, we assessed its additional value over pleural fluid cytology and its short-term reproducibility and reliability following pleural inflammatory processes, including pleurodesis. Methods: Mesothelin was quantified in 424 pleural fluid and 64 serum samples by ELISA. Fluid was collected prospectively from 167 patients who presented with pleural effusions for investigation. Serial pleural fluid samples were obtained from patients (n=33) requiring repeated drainage. Mesothelin levels were also measured in patients (n=32) pre- and post pleurodesis Findings: Pleural fluid mesothelin concentrations were significantly higher in mesothelioma patients (n=24) over those with metastatic carcinomas (n=67) and benign effusions (n=75): median (QR25-QR75) = 40.3 (18.3-68.1) vs. 6.1 (1.5-13.2) vs. 3.7 (0.0-12.4) nM respectively, p<0.0001. Mesothelin measurement was superior to cytological examination in the diagnosis and exclusion of mesothelioma (sensitivity 71% vs. 35%; specificity 89% vs. 100%; negative predictive value 95% vs. 82% respectively). In patients with 'suspicious' cytology, pleural fluid mesothelin was 100% specific for mesothelioma, and in cytology-negative effusions (n=105), offered a negative predictive value of 94%. Intra-individual reproducibility of pleural fluid mesothelin was excellent: mean(±SD) variation -0.15(±8.41) nM in samples collected within seven days from mesothelioma patients. Measurements remained reliable following pleurodesis and were not affected by the presence of bacteria. Conclusion: Pleural fluid mesothelin provides additional diagnostic value over cytological examination. Mesothelin measurements are reproducible and not affected by inflammatory pleural processes.


Key words: Mesothelin • Mesothelioma • Pleural effusion







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 2009 American Thoracic Society
  ATS 2008 State of the Art Course