Published ahead of print on June 11, 2009, doi:10.1164/rccm.200901-0076OC Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 180, Number 5, September 2009, 445-453 A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009
Submitted on January 15, 2009 A Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening With Spiral CT (The Dante Trial): Three-Year ResultsMaurizio Infante1*,1 Thoracic Surgery Department, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 2 Consultant Statistician, Italian Association for the Fight Against Cancer, Milano, Italy, 3 Radiology Department, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 4 Thoracic Surgery Department, Humanitas-Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy, 5 Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 6 Radiology Department, Humanitas-Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy, 7 Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas-Catania Oncology Centre, Catania, Italy, 8 Radiology Department, Humanitas-Catania Oncology Centre, Italy, Italy, 9 Pathology Department, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milano, Italy * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: maurizio.infante{at}humanitas.it.
Rationale: Screening for lung cancer with modern imaging technology may decrease lung cancer mortality, but encouraging results have only been obtained in uncontrolled studies. Objectives: To explore the effect of screening with low-dose spiral CT (LDCT) on lung cancer mortality. Secondary endpoints are incidence, stage, resectability and survival. Methods: Male subjects, aged 60-75, smokers of 20+ pack-years were randomized to screening with low-dose spiral CT or control. All participants underwent a baseline, once-only chest X-ray (CXR) and sputum cytology examination. Screening-arm subjects had LDCT upon accrual, to be repeated every year for four additional years, while controls had a yearly medical examination only. Measurements and Main Results: 2472 cases (LDCT 1276, control 1196) were randomized. After a median follow-up of 33 months, lung cancer was detected in 60 (4.7%) LDCT patients and 34 (2.8%) controls (p=0.016). Stage I rates were 54% and 34% respectively (p=0.06), and complete resectability rates were 60% and 50% (p=0.35). Five-year actuarial survival of lung cancer patients was slightly better (p=0.08), and less symptomatic cases were detected in the screening arm. However, the number of advanced lung cancer cases was the same. 20 LDCT patients (1.6%) and 20 controls (1.7%) have died of lung cancer, while 26 and 25 respectively have died of other causes. Conclusions: A small stage-shift in favor of the screening arm was observed, while resection rates, advanced case rates and disease-specific mortality were similar. Lung cancer screening by spiral CT should not be advertised or proposed outside research programs. Clinical Trials Registry information: I.D. #NCT00420862, available at www.clinicaltrials.gov Key words: Lung neoplasms early diagnosis Screening Spiral CT scan Randomized Controlled Trial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||